Inexpensive steroids reduce deaths of hospitalized Covid-19 patients, WHO analysis confirms

Use of inexpensive, readily available steroid drugs to treat people hospitalized with Covid-19 reduced the
risk of death by one-third, according to an analysis encompassing seven different clinical trials5 conducted
by the World Health Organization and published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical
Association.

The positive steroid findings — the result of a pooled look at data known as a meta-analysis — confirm a
similar survival benefit reported in June from a single, large study6. Corticosteroids are the first, and so far
only, therapy shown to improve the odds of survival for critically ill patients with Covid-19.

Based on the newly published data, the WHO on Wednesday issued new treatment guidelines7 calling for
corticosteroids to become the standard of care for patients with “severe and critical” Covid-19. Such patients
should receive 7-10 days of treatment, a WHO panel said. But it cautioned against use of the steroids in
patients with non-severe illness, saying that “indiscriminate use of any therapy for COVID-19 would
potentially rapidly deplete global resources and deprive patients who may benefit from it most as potentially
life-saving therapy.”

“The consistent findings of benefit in these studies provide definitive data that corticosteroids should be firstline
treatment for critically ill patients with COVID-19,” said Hallie Prescott and Todd Rice, professors of
medicine at the University of Michigan and Vanderbilt University, respectively, in an accompanying accompanying JAMA editorial8Related: 6

Major study finds common steroid reduces deaths among patients with severe Covid-19 6
Nahid Bhadelia, medical director of the Special Pathogens Unit at the Boston University School of
Medicine, said “there has been widespread adoption of steroids in the care of critically ill patients with
Covid-19” since the first trial results in June. “This is particularly true in many resource-limited countries
where I work. This meta-analysis adds further confidence” to those results, she added.

Other groups, including the National Institutes of Health and the Infectious Diseases Society of America,
have already issued similar guidelines recommending the use of steroids to treat patients with severe Covid-
19.

The new analysis included data on 678 patients randomized to treatment with steroids and 1,025 patients to
usual care or a placebo. All of the patients had a confirmed diagnosis of Covid-19 and were admitted to the
hospital. Most were on mechanical ventilation. Twenty-nine percent of the patients were women, but a
breakdown by race was not disclosed.

After 28 days, 33% of the steroid-treated patients had died, compared to 41% of the patients on usual care or
a placebo. In the meta-analysis, the difference in absolute mortality translated into a 34% reduction in the
risk of death for those given steroids — a statistically significant result.
The survival benefit remained consistent regardless of the type of steroid administered, the dose, or whether
patients were receiving mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen only, researchers found.
Eighteen percent of patients on steroids reported side effects compared to 23% of patients on usual care or
placebo. Adverse events varied across trials but there was no suggestion that the risk of serious adverse
events was higher in patients assigned to corticosteroids except for the two smallest trials, in which the total
number of serious adverse events was one and three. Related: 9

Experts see a chance for a Covid-19 vaccine approval this fall — if it’s done right 9

Corticosteroids do not directly attack the novel coronavirus. Instead, the drugs work by dampening the
activity of a patient’s immune system to prevent it from attacking the lungs — a serious and often fatal
condition called acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS.

The first evidence that common steroids could improve the survival of patients with severe Covid-19 came in
June when British researchers conducting a large clinical trial called RECOVERY reported that the use of
dexamethasone reduced the death rate6 by 35% in patients requiring ventilation and by 20% in patients who
needed oxygen but were not ventilated.

Prior to the public announcement of the RECOVERY trial results, physicians had been reluctant to use
steroids to treat severely ill Covid-19 patients due to concerns about side effects. Clinical trials involving
other immune-suppressing drugs like IL-6 inhibitors were also yielding disappointing results.

Patrick Vallance, the U.K. government’s chief scientific adviser, speaking in June, called the dexamethasone
survival benefit from the RECOVERY study “tremendous news” and “a groundbreaking development in our
fight” against Covid-19. But the findings also hampered efforts to confirm the results. Other randomized and
controlled clinical trials investigating the use of steroids at that time were unable to enroll additional patients.

For that reason, the WHO’s Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group stepped in to coordinate the meta-analysis of these incomplete but randomized and controlled trials. The analysis was done prospectively, meaning that data and outcomes from the seven individual trials were not known in advance, but were shared for the first time with the WHO team in order to reduce the chance of
bias.

Three of the individual clinical trials of steroids were published in JAMA Wednesday, alongside the WHO’s
meta-analysis.

“The efforts of the clinical trial groups for the launch and conduct of high-quality trials in the midst of a
pandemic should be acknowledged as an important accomplishment. The agreement among the trialists to
share unpublished data with WHO is an example of how science can advance and is critical in the midst of
what is likely to be numerous underpowered [randomized controlled trials],” write Prescott and Rice in their
JAMA editorial.

The WHO’s meta-analysis leaves some questions about steroids and Covid-19 unanswered, said Boston
University’s Bhadelia.

“It still remains unclear if there is any use in starting [steroids] earlier. Most clinicians, including myself,
would not do so with the current data,” she said, adding that they’re also uncertain whether to use biomarkers
to guide therapy rather than oxygenation only.

One of the concerns about steroids is, given too early in the course of Covid-19, they might hamper the
body’s ability to eliminate the virus, leading to worse outcomes. But steroids might also benefit a subset of
Covid-19 patients who don’t yet need oxygen but have lab tests indicating early signals of their immune
system going into overdrive.

“It would be interesting to know if co-administration of an antiviral may help reduce viral load while the
earlier steroids work on the inflammatory component in that group of people,” Bhadelia said. “We also need
more data around co-infections in the setting of steroid use.”